Messages posted by: EvilConker

Gabbers, shut up and take your uneducated posts and broken english somwhere else, this isn't the time OR place to post that.

Anyways, I'm going to mourn the end of BCPT, for it is the final nail on the coffin of the "EA Era" as I called it in my post about the decades of C&C. That's not to say it's the end of EA, but it's the end of how C&C has been handled in the last few years.

I'm not expecting anymore truckloads of cash in the games anymore, I'm not expecting the sense of community we had formed, while sites like Planet C&C might still exist and this forum might still exist, it's very hard to say if they'll ever be the same.

Turf is a lot less expensive then multi million dollar military grade buildings with tons of blast reinforcing and expensive equipment and such.

Believe it or not, if the US military could, it would make mobile bases.

Lol you're 27...

Anyways, Happy Birthday CNCGEEK!

videogmer314 wrote:

RealBobMcBob wrote:I love how america is involved in this, even tho they didnt do sh17 in WW2.

We did use two nukes, though.

We also took back france, got England put back together into a respectable country, and organized the largest invasion in military history.

AND we also did that while fighting a war on two fronts.

EAT IT!

Commander_McNash wrote:

EvilConker wrote:

R-Wolff wrote:I think that the defining era was the best. C&C was just starting to evolve into a much better series with all the innovations that came with Tiberain Sun, Red Alert 2, and Renegade.

I would agree in a sense, but as the EA Era closes, I'm starting to prefer it.
The mods and games I've seen here are some of the highest quality ones (Generals, APB, I also liked TW.)

However, all those wouldn't have come to be without the Defining Era...

I remember that while I played since I was a child C&C, I almost never went online, to be honest I wasnt sure about most of the what was going around, since I didnt have internet connection at that time (I am 24, so you can how different the world was on this time) I really started to get into the online aspect with RA2-YR, there it was when I learnt about matter of the community I previously didnt pay attention, also YR was the first game where I started to actually play online sometimes, and of course there it was the first time when I learnt about game balance, continuous patching, etc.

I think the community REALLY started to come together with Renegade and Generals, RA2 started it off, but those two are where it started to take shape.

The internet as a whole also plays a role here, the internet was still 5 years old during YR, and it lacked enough structure, but as time moved on, it started gaining structure.

R-Wolff wrote:I think that the defining era was the best. C&C was just starting to evolve into a much better series with all the innovations that came with Tiberain Sun, Red Alert 2, and Renegade.

I would agree in a sense, but as the EA Era closes, I'm starting to prefer it.
The mods and games I've seen here are some of the highest quality ones (Generals, APB, I also liked TW.)

However, all those wouldn't have come to be without the Defining Era...

Looks like SLAYER's half blind.

bluestar wrote:

EvilConker wrote:Some people really do lack an IQ on these forums, don't they?

And I just know some smartass is going to post "like you lolololol" and think they're hardcore.

like u lolololol

but in all seriousness, yes, y u wanted to come back, i don't know, maybe ur a little bit special.

#1. Who are you? You signed up on December 12th, 2009, you have no idea about what we're talking about anyways.

#2. I came back because I came back, ever noticed that I started re-appearing shortly after the beta?
Hint Hint?
Nudge Nudge?

R-Wolff wrote:It looks cool but what is the game about

Looking at paper cutouts moving...
Oh what fun.

Some people really do lack an IQ on these forums, don't they?

And I just know some smartass is going to post "like you lolololol" and think they're hardcore.

Nahilus wrote:

EvilConker wrote:

Nahilus wrote:

SLAYER00 wrote: Your acting immaturely at present then

k

EvilConker wrote:Then why did you even start this to begin with?
You confuse me, I didn't tell you to come and start arguing, did I now?

You were discussing it, I added my input.

Fine, whatever.
I really don't care about your input, but at least I care about SLAYER's less.

If you really didn't care, you would ignore him, like everyone else does.

Wasn't he once a respectable user?
I was thinking on those terms, but I guess he made some new ones.

Nahilus wrote:

SLAYER00 wrote: Your acting immaturely at present then

k

EvilConker wrote:Then why did you even start this to begin with?
You confuse me, I didn't tell you to come and start arguing, did I now?

You were discussing it, I added my input.

Fine, whatever.
I really don't care about your input, but at least I care about SLAYER's less.

Both, but in all honesty, I can't make a direct comparison since they fill in two different lusts for RTS's, and they're also released at different times.

It's like comparing Age of Empires 2 to Red Alert 2, it doesn't work, they're completely different games.

And...?
My computer could eat that computer they were handing out.

I went with N64, it's got more gems then any other console.

Super Mario 64...
Banjo-Kazooie...
Banjo-Tooie...
Conker's Bad Fur Day...
Goldeneye...
Mario Party 3 (I liked it...)

Do I even need to go on?

Popular Platforms

Popular Genres

EA.com

Help