@EALA Assault Destroyer really is a problem. We allready have abusers!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 7/2/09 2:44:55 AM

91_Slavik wrote:well some1 said to me was 130%...ima gonna bash him later

Lolk

Caustic wrote:Well from watching this replay you posted it looked to me like it was an awesome game. It didn't consist of Soviets Tesla Expanding followed by Twinblade spam or PK/Turret/Tanya Drop. Learn to treasure balanced games when you get them instead of complaining. Sure he was spamming AD's, but they certainly weren't invincible. Just learn to deal with them like everything else.

so if EA made a coding error and made the hammer tank have the same hp/defense as an mcv, you would be saying "learn to deal with it" ?

I think you should stick to playing ko.

Lol, ironically, the AD coding error actually made the dam thing useful.

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:Lol, ironically, the AD coding error actually made the dam thing useful.

I'm sure they would still be "useful" if they were only as good as the patch said they would be. right now they are about as "useful" as shoguns used to be. (ie you build a few of them and you cant lose)

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:Lol, ironically, the AD coding error actually made the dam thing useful.

I've used them effectively in 1.10 aswell. The poor japaese player didn't know what to do and was screaming at me: HOW DO I COUNTER IT

BTW it was only 1 AD with a bunch of infantry I've used on snow plow. 90% of the players turret push on that map so they could even dream of doing anything original

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 7/2/09 10:08:21 AM

RogerDodger wrote:2 ADs + 2 IFVs(Eng)+ 5 Guardians

You could build shoguns in that time FFS.

Or apocs.

Please stop posting like you know something about the game, like you know how long it takes to build things, and like you understand how the game balances in terms of time/force effectiveness ratio. Allied fanboy detected. Please be quiet.

91_Slavik wrote:

psycho063 wrote:

Spoooky wrote:

91_Slavik wrote:

not a bug pls scout

I didn't say it's a bug.

I said it's a bad change, and it needs to be undone.

Not in this thread you don't! Scram with your whining about random!

QFT my fellow random player

also spoooky it aint fun brakin, jsut means u hav to get up ur behind and scout lol, cuz even if u know wut faction ur enemy is and u dont scout ure probs dead

He probably does scout, he just wants to have his build-order down before that thirty-second time delay. He also doesn't wanna be forced to build a barracks. I understand, since I'm a soviet player and I sometimes wf rush.

We are aware of the problem. Please see APOC's official post about the situation:

"Hey guys,

So it turns out this was an unfortunate XML error in the patch, we're fully aware and are going to make every effort to fix it as soon as possible. Due to the 4th of July Holiday weekend, we are unable to acquire all the deploy resources to put a patch out this week. So it will not be fixed this week, unfortunately. Apologies for that but the timing isn't great.

This balance error is impossible for us to monitor and control as its a simple balance exploit that can be abused easily. While we can't tell everyone to please stay away from using the Assault Destroyer in such a fashion, we do politely ask that you refrain from exploiting it as such.

I will let you guys know next week what the outlook is for a hot-fix. The fix is a simple XML modification, as many of you would know, but we will need to go through all of our STEAM, MAC, etc deploy channels to get it out, which is what takes some extra time.

Apologies for this error, we'll address it as soon as possible next week.

-APOC"

Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Wertilq wrote:Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Yes it would make 1000000000000 times more sense that way (i thought he was Apoc

)

firehk0515 wrote:

Wertilq wrote:Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Yes it would make 1000000000000 times more sense that way (i thought he was Apoc )

2POC is APOCs pet

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 7/2/09 6:21:05 PM

Wertilq wrote:

firehk0515 wrote:

Wertilq wrote:Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Yes it would make 1000000000000 times more sense that way (i thought he was Apoc )

2POC is APOCs abused pet

APOC shot 2POC in the face with an Assault Rifle! D:

I found out that if you have a naval army and there are a mass of akulas attack it and there is a small island, you could put an assult destroyer on the island and use it's ability to attract all the torpedoes to the AD but instead it hits the island causing no damage done to your units or the AD and stopping all of the akula attacks. I also found out that the black hole armor even draws in the akula's ability.

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:

Wertilq wrote:

firehk0515 wrote:

Wertilq wrote:Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Yes it would make 1000000000000 times more sense that way (i thought he was Apoc )

2POC is APOCs abused pet

APOC shot 2POC in the face with an Assault Rifle! D:

oh noes!

wait, if its the conscript assault rifle its ok

91_Slavik wrote:

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:

Wertilq wrote:

firehk0515 wrote:

Wertilq wrote:Didn't apoc post that in this thread? xD Wouldn't it be more awesome to use the quote thingy xD

Yes it would make 1000000000000 times more sense that way (i thought he was Apoc )

2POC is APOCs abused pet

APOC shot 2POC in the face with an Assault Rifle! D:

oh noes!

wait, if its the conscript assault rifle its ok

I'm too lazy to bring up the BCPT episode, but judging from what I remember, I think it was a GD-2 Rifle.

EA_Apoc wrote:Hey guys,

So it turns out this was an unfortunate XML error in the patch, we're fully aware and are going to make every effort to fix it as soon as possible. Due to the 4th of July Holiday weekend, we are unable to acquire all the deploy resources to put a patch out this week. So it will not be fixed this week, unfortunately. Apologies for that but the timing isn't great.

This balance error is impossible for us to monitor and control as its a simple balance exploit that can be abused easily. While we can't tell everyone to please stay away from using the Assault Destroyer in such a fashion, we do politely ask that you refrain from exploiting it as such.

I will let you guys know next week what the outlook is for a hot-fix. The fix is a simple XML modification, as many of you would know, but we will need to go through all of our STEAM, MAC, etc deploy channels to get it out, which is what takes some extra time.

Apologies for this error, we'll address it as soon as possible next week.

-APOC

Hotfix as RA3 patch 1.12.... Very much a small task but still a big download just for that fix.

Will there be "Custom Maps" section in RA3 patch 1.12? Please???? Some people are waiting to play real-time SP custom mission maps.

Popular Platforms

Popular Genres

EA.com

Help