Command & Conquer Forum
  [Search] Search   [Recent Topics] Recent Topics   [Hottest Topics] Hottest Topics   [Members]  Member Listing   [Groups] Back to forum index 
[Login] Login 
smallest victorious assault!!!  XML
Forum Index » Soviet Strategies
Author Message
[Post New]11/6/09 1:13:05 PM
    Subject: smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Jben



Joined: 10/30/09 10:51:59 AM
Messages: 9
Offline
1 natasha
2 bull frogs
2 stingrays
[Post New]11/6/09 1:41:07 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Pimmeh667

Veteran Infantry

Joined: 9/17/09 6:24:50 AM
Messages: 689
Location: The Netherlands
Offline
1 Apoc, 1 sickle and 1 conscript(if Natasha uses pilot snipe so you can recap the apoc.).

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 11/6/09 5:16:58 PM
http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac48/Never-less/Pimmeh1.jpg
[MSN]
[Post New]11/6/09 4:15:24 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
firehk0515

Commando

Joined: 11/5/08 6:04:19 PM
Messages: 5105
Location: United Kingdom
Offline
4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.
I hope someone resurects RA3boards, i miss my sig
EA should have made CCG2 tbh No seriously CCG2, would've been a lot f***ing better than C&C4
[Post New]11/6/09 5:16:21 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Pimmeh667

Veteran Infantry

Joined: 9/17/09 6:24:50 AM
Messages: 689
Location: The Netherlands
Offline
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.
http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac48/Never-less/Pimmeh1.jpg
[MSN]
[Post New]11/6/09 5:17:50 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
firehk0515

Commando

Joined: 11/5/08 6:04:19 PM
Messages: 5105
Location: United Kingdom
Offline
Pimmeh667 wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.


Doesn't matter.
I hope someone resurects RA3boards, i miss my sig
EA should have made CCG2 tbh No seriously CCG2, would've been a lot f***ing better than C&C4
[Post New]11/6/09 9:36:54 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Fitz

Peacekeeper

Joined: 11/6/08 10:22:08 PM
Messages: 413
Offline
firehk0515 wrote:
Pimmeh667 wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.


Doesn't matter.


Ok, less expensive; a lot of bears/dogs.
[Post New]11/7/09 1:52:31 AM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
jollyranc

Peacekeeper

Joined: 8/2/09 2:36:55 AM
Messages: 320
Location: Classified Information
Offline
Everything except infantry and noob tactics>That

I believe that sums it up
Im the Master of Secrets, like how my secret is that my signature is so secret and it's a secret that you can't know that it's a secret.....
[Post New]11/7/09 5:34:58 AM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Sturmgewehr88

Veteran Infantry

Joined: 4/4/09 10:24:55 AM
Messages: 516
Offline
The "engineer rush" that ONLY worked in the beta and when the game first came out.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y24/rats_for_candy/yaymynewsig.jpg
[Post New]11/7/09 7:36:35 AM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
firehk0515

Commando

Joined: 11/5/08 6:04:19 PM
Messages: 5105
Location: United Kingdom
Offline
Fitz wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:
Pimmeh667 wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.


Doesn't matter.


Ok, less expensive; a lot of bears/dogs.


1 stingray > infinte numbers of bears/dogs
I hope someone resurects RA3boards, i miss my sig
EA should have made CCG2 tbh No seriously CCG2, would've been a lot f***ing better than C&C4
[Post New]11/7/09 8:30:43 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Fitz

Peacekeeper

Joined: 11/6/08 10:22:08 PM
Messages: 413
Offline
firehk0515 wrote:
Fitz wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:
Pimmeh667 wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.


Doesn't matter.


Ok, less expensive; a lot of bears/dogs.


1 stingray > infinte numbers of bears/dogs


That was just to combat the natasha. Once shes done, its easy.
[Post New]11/7/09 8:55:39 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
firehk0515

Commando

Joined: 11/5/08 6:04:19 PM
Messages: 5105
Location: United Kingdom
Offline
Fitz wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:
Fitz wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:
Pimmeh667 wrote:
firehk0515 wrote:4 vinds > that

WF + king oni > that

5 twinbaldes > that

Nuff said.


Still bigger and more expensive then mine.


Doesn't matter.


Ok, less expensive; a lot of bears/dogs.


1 stingray > infinte numbers of bears/dogs


That was just to combat the natasha. Once shes done, its easy.


Natasha would hide in one of the bullfrogs
I hope someone resurects RA3boards, i miss my sig
EA should have made CCG2 tbh No seriously CCG2, would've been a lot f***ing better than C&C4
[Post New]11/11/09 7:30:44 PM
    Subject: smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
Captain_Obvious

Veteran Infantry

Joined: 11/11/08 8:43:52 PM
Messages: 642
Offline
Kinda wasting natasha....
[Post New]11/14/09 9:56:20 PM
    Subject: Re:smallest victorious assault!!!
[Up]
karlozz



Joined: 10/16/09 2:56:23 AM
Messages: 25
Offline
Lol smaller cheaper and will still serve all those units. 2 Vindicators.
http://profile.xfire.com/ka4l0z
I also speak Spanish so feel free.
[Email]
 
Forum Index » Soviet Strategies
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.8 © JForum Team