GDI Mastodon Unit Profile - return of a classic + gameplay footage!

Why does it lower itself before it attacks. To target the enemy.

The body seems too big for the legs to hold up, and the cannon in front makes it look like it's going to fall on its head.

Is it just me, or is the turret a bit too big???? (if this has been posted somewhere else, I am sorry...I was too lazy to read through 7 pages of replies

explain to me why the "artillery" is mounted on the chin and the rocket pods are mounted on the back? shouldn't the artillery be on the back and the rocket pods be near the head, or maybe under the chin/or something?

Hope we will get to see a Nod unit profile soon.

GDI_EVA wrote:explain to me why the "artillery" is mounted on the chin and the rocket pods are mounted on the back? shouldn't the artillery be on the back and the rocket pods be near the head, or maybe under the chin/or something?

The artillery's probably mortars, which can realistically be launched from small launchers, although if the stuff on its chin were mortars launchers, they're grossly enormous.

Valdez wrote:

GDI_EVA wrote:explain to me why the "artillery" is mounted on the chin and the rocket pods are mounted on the back? shouldn't the artillery be on the back and the rocket pods be near the head, or maybe under the chin/or something?

The artillery's probably mortars, which can realistically be launched from small launchers, although if the stuff on its chin were mortars launchers, they're grossly enormous.

Apparently they fire sonic shells, so imaginations can run wild on the size of the cannons required to shoot the things.

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:

Valdez wrote:

GDI_EVA wrote:explain to me why the "artillery" is mounted on the chin and the rocket pods are mounted on the back? shouldn't the artillery be on the back and the rocket pods be near the head, or maybe under the chin/or something?

The artillery's probably mortars, which can realistically be launched from small launchers, although if the stuff on its chin were mortars launchers, they're grossly enormous.

Apparently they fire sonic shells, so imaginations can run wild on the size of the cannons required to shoot the things.

well.... isnt bigger always better?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 11/4/09 9:08:27 AM

The guns are much better than the concept at least:

http://www.commandandconquer.com/sites/default/files/content/page/images/attachments/CnC4MastodonConcept1.jpg

^These guns look like they can hardly take on a buggy.

dky.tehkingd.u wrote:The guns are much better than the concept at least:

^These guns look like they can hardly take on a buggy.

heres the thing when it comes to makeing a game, concept art =/= final model, always.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 11/4/09 10:33:09 PM

There are definitely units that I think that need to be redone, but this isn't one of them, this one is designed well.

Diablo wrote:There are definitely units that I think that need to be redone, but this isn't one of them, this one is designed well.

Lol, something of a backhanded compliment eh?

.

Kyang wrote:Lol, something of a backhanded compliment eh? .

haha, well people have to make their point, otherwise these things go unchanged and come time the game's out; it's turned into something you don't want.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 11/5/09 4:00:53 PM

Looks good

But seriously,,

SPLIT YOU LUNGS WITH BLOOD AND THUNDER!

WHEN YOU SEE THE WHITE WHALE!

you know you want to..

Udderman wrote:
But seriously,,

SPLIT YOU LUNGS WITH BLOOD AND THUNDER!

IF YOU SEE THE WHITE WHALE!

you know you want to..

???

Popular Platforms

Popular Genres

EA.com

Help